Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dyker Beach Golf Course


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Courcelles 05:57, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Dyker Beach Golf Course

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable local golf course Orange Mike   &#x007C;   Talk  17:31, 16 October 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. There seem to be a few sources (such as here and here, and a hint of another here) which may just push it over the notability threshold. Jimmy Pitt   talk  18:45, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   Wifione    .......  Leave a message  13:49, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - 's efforts notwithstanding, it doesn't appear to pass WP:GNG. —Tim Pierce (talk) 17:09, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Golf courses, like major parks, are  significant geographic features and therefore always notable.    DGG ( talk ) 02:24, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep This golf course is more than 100 years old. It gets tons of mentions and an occasional actual article  in the New York Times. Tiger Woods's father learned golf there. It's described as "one of the most played public golf courses in the nation."  I don't agree with DGG that all golf courses are notable, but this one certainly seems to be. I'll add some sourcing to the article. --MelanieN (talk) 05:22, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
 * There, I cleaned up the writing, deleted the namedropping of non-notables, and added sources. --MelanieN (talk) 05:56, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.