Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dylan Ace


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was '''Delete. Notability concerns aside, the article should have been speedy deleted as spam.'''. Pascal.Tesson 09:09, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Dylan Ace

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable magician who according to the article, is a household name in many parts of Latin America & Spain and has been the opening act for the Bee Gees, and many others. Strange that a household name with such an impressive career only gets 160 Ghits, none of which are significant coverage in reliable sources. There are a couple of passing mentions confirming he made short appearances on magic shows, but nothing about Dylan Ace himself. Created by a single-purpose account. Saikokira 00:48, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - because he says he is the future of magic and I've a suspicion that he's not being entirely honest . Pal X 01:00, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Rule #1 of AfD: Never do a vote without giving a reason why. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 01:03, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * No, the first rule of AfD is 'You don't talk about AfD' Nick mallory 01:22, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Fool, you broke the first rule! --fuzzy510 01:57, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Aaarargghhh! Nick mallory 03:57, 6 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete, clearly non-notable per nom. Perhaps an A7 (non-notable person) candidate. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 01:03, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * But he's "the future of magic" and the same height as Houdini. Isn't that notable enough?! Saikokira 04:08, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * delete per WP:LIVING and lack of WP:RS. Also, it's blatant WP:VSCA; is there a speedy criterion for deleting spam? AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 01:24, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep per this and this Corpx 05:05, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per Corpx. --xDanielx Talk 22:39, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per Corpx. Mathmo Talk 21:29, 7 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.