Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dylan rosenthal

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. &mdash; Xezbeth 07:21, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)

Dylan rosenthal
Subject is supposedly a 16-year-old actor. Googling "Dylan Rosenthal" +"Cheaper by the Dozen 2" (his only really notable alleged work) receives 0 hits. [|The IMDB Entry] for CbtD2 does not show him. "Dylan Rosenthal" + actor on Google gives three hits, two of which are from a local paper. He seems to be a young actor who may potentially become Wikipedia-worthy, but, as his career stands currently, he is not yet notable enough. Delete. jglc | t | c 20:23, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * This autobio looks like a delete right now. Feydey 20:57, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, how big does he have to be to qualify? I feel the standards of qualification are not etched in stone, so many people in here at were popular in the 80s and early 90s may also sadly face a VfD.  Antares33712 21:42, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * I have two issues with the entry: First, it is unverifiable. I'm not so sure he's really in CbtD2. Second... you raise a good question. How well-known do you have to be to be notable? jglc | t | c 22:14, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Since Cheaper by the Dozen 2 won't be released until next year we can't really say he's been in the movie. It's still being filmed. IMDb doesn't list him and my attitude towards IMDb is that an entry there doesn't necessarily mean you're notable enough for WP, but no entry there disqualifies you here (that is, if you're a film actor). This doesn't even say what role he allegedly plays, I wouldn't be surprised if he's an extra. Obvious delete. -R. fiend 23:00, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable. JamesBurns 01:13, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable (yet). Martg76 09:22, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article does not establish sufficient notability for me to vote keep. Gamaliel 09:27, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.