Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dynamic Zombie Sandbox


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to ARMA 2. Any content to be merged can be salvaged from this history. :) · Salvidrim!  ·  &#9993;  17:35, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Dynamic Zombie Sandbox
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Canwin87 (talk) 00:47, 1 February 2013 (UTC) 
 * No reliable sources to verify article content.
 * Subject fails to meet notability guideline for a Video game.
 * No assertion of notability and searches reveal no evidence of it.
 * Mod is not notable, have gained no media coverage.
 * Appears to be entirely based on original research.
 * Delete Please note that the article creator has posted on the talk page of this AFD, linking to this interview and the mission's ModDB homepage. What I'm not seeing here (from the provided sources or from my own web searches) are the reliable independent sources covering the mission in detail, needed to fit in with the notability guideline. ModDB's homepage for it is effectively a self-published source, the user reviews are not usable for any purpose either. The interview on FPS Guru is a usable source, but again is effectively non-independent as it's the creator talking about their creation. What's needed are some in-depth features/reviews on it from the likes of Rock, Paper, Shotgun or magazines etc. No prejudice against recreation of the article should the relevant sources appear. Someoneanother 00:27, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect to ARMA 2, perhaps with a line or two merged, until independent notability is established. - The Bushranger One ping only 18:08, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:27, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:15, 16 February 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.