Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dynastic (company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 00:40, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Dynastic (company)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non notable organization that fails to satisfy WP:ORGCRIT as they lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. A before search links To LinkedIn like websites and other user generated sources which we do not consider reliable Celestina007 (talk) 00:16, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 00:16, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 00:16, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 00:16, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 00:16, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 00:16, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 00:16, 16 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - Appears to clearly fail WP:ORGCRIT. The sources are either tweets, unreliable, or published by Dynastic itself. ThadeusOfNazerethTalk to Me! 08:12, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and above; BigBoss also has similar notability concerns, in my opinion Spiderone  11:06, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I think you may be right about this page, but BigBoss is quite separate due to the history behind it and shouldn’t be conflated. WRB (talk) 20:54, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and the subject fails WP:N basic notability requirements. -- A Rose Wolf ( Talk ) 19:56, 19 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.