Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dynasty (Two Steps From Hell album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Two Steps From Hell. The Bushranger One ping only 01:17, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Dynasty (Two Steps From Hell album)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 17:57, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 17:57, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

no indication of WP:notability. Does not appear to be an album as such, more a demo for potential or actual clients of the company. No significant coverage in WP:reliable sources. noq (talk) 17:38, 17 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Two Steps From Hell as a non-notable trailer. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:28, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The Dynasty album is mentioned as reference on the Wikipedia pages of the Capellen Orchestra, Petr Pololanik (internal links recently added) and is also listed as reference on the official Capellen Orchestra page. The album isn't only a promotion item of TSFH, but is also reference material of various musicians involved in the making of it. Wtfitsadinosaur (talk) 12:04, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment Wikipedia is not a WP:reliable source so being mentioned on a wiki page does not make it notable. The Capellen orchestra page contains a link to the two steps from hell website only and nothing more - and that link is dead anyway. noq (talk) 12:39, 20 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:03, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 14:46, 31 July 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.