Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dynasty Entertainment


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 13:51, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Dynasty Entertainment
Cannot validate that the company or anything they have produced is notable Nv8200p talk 23:02, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete Can find nothing notable about them at all. Beaner1 06:16, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete NN, as per nom. --Ragib 05:37, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete NN--Runcorn 10:09, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 *  AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, No Guru 15:23, 24 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment - AfD notice was not added to article at time of nomination. Re-listing to ensure due process is observed. -- No Guru 15:23, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Tevildo 17:01, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. The company is notable. It has released a number of projects. TruthbringerToronto 19:04, 24 June 2006 (UTC) It is both a record label and film studio. TruthbringerToronto 19:10, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Speedy Delete Utterly non-notable small-time small-town company which is neither record label nor a film studio despite its (or Truthbringer's) claims; whose owner is also the company's main and only music act; and which doesn't even have a website. Possible total fantasy/hoax. (Truthbringer is such a cool name btw). Bwithh 01:36, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable, per nom. Ifnord 19:15, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, "rapidly growing" does not necessarily mean "notable". --Coredesat 21:01, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete could find no evidence of notability (or even that the company exists). There is a notable "Dynasty Entertainment", but it isn't this one. --DaveG12345 06:24, 25 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.