Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dyslexic Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:40, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Dyslexic Records

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable record label, fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. Article doesn't have any sources either, and I wasn't able to find any reliable sources per the criterion listed at WP:GNG. – Miles Edgeworth Talk 02:13, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. – Miles Edgeworth Talk 02:14, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. – Miles Edgeworth Talk 02:14, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:01, 15 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - this is a one-sentence article, and the use of the past tense indicates that the record label is now defunct. I am willing to change this to a keep if the article gains more content. Vorbee (talk) 09:42, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: lacks necessary coverage for corporations (WP:NCORP). I would have gone speedy delete but I see the page history has a declined CSD a few years back.  Janet-O (talk) 11:48, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Striking out sockpuppet !vote. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:55, 16 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. “If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list.” (WP:GNG) There is no evidence that this statement is true for this article. --Michael Powerhouse (talk) 19:56, 21 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.