Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dysonism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete - The two keep votes are from vandals. I strongly suspect that they are sockpuppets of the author of Dysonism (namely User:Dysonism). I shall snowball this and put the lot of them under vandalwatch. - Richardcavell 12:54, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Dysonism
De-prod by anonymous user without explanation. NN neologism that gets 88 google hits. Irongargoyle 00:41, 27 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep Dysonism is real. I've seen it multiple times in world of warcraft. I use it myself sometimes. It should be kept. It is REAL. -Arisoni
 * Strong Keep Dysonism is a form of art. Just because you have no clue or know nothing about it doesnt mean that you should up it for delete. Many (being 50+) people I know Practice this form of art. Spiffydudex
 * Delete, per nom and WP:NFT. --Mr. L e fty Talk to me! 00:42, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete, unbelievably nonnotable. NawlinWiki 01:08, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, ridiculous. User:Shy1520 1:18, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete xxpor (  Talk |  Contribs ) 02:12, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn. &mdash; Khoikhoi 03:00, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete steamsteamlol.ytmnd.com Many (being 50+) people I know Practice this form of art. Danny Lilithborne 03:38, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Definately unnotable. Bradcis 04:09, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Needs to be more widely known to be notable - perhaps in the future it will be, but until then  WP is not a Crystal Ball Seaphoto 04:25, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:NEO, notability not established. --Ter e nce Ong (T 05:02, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unverifiable, non notable, and likely made up in school one day. Resolute 05:36, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.--Jersey Devil 07:58, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom --Mecanismo | Talk 11:24, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.