Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dysynergy

Dysynergy was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE

From Cleanup: Dysynergy - What the? 32 google hits (moved from Cleanup by SimonP)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * The first of the mere 34 mentions in Google is a Wikinfo entry for Phil O. Cetes, who happens to be a major contributor for the article in question. He also put something nearly identical (and equally incomprehensible) in synergy, evidently as both User:69.35.75.216 and himself.  Delete the article and revert the changes to synergy.  --Ardonik 04:37, Jul 16, 2004 (UTC)
 * Neologism that is defined in the article by other neologisms (e.g. "mereologic"). Delete. (I already reverted the edits in synergy.) Rossami 21:04, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete neologism dicdef. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 02:26, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Dicdef neologism delete. Bacchiad 03:53, 22 Jul 2004 (UTC)