Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dzimitry Kanavalau


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 06:06, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Dzimitry Kanavalau

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Per WP:PERPETRATOR: ''A living person accused of a crime is not guilty unless and until this is decided by a court of law. Editors must give serious consideration to not creating an article on an alleged perpetrator when no conviction is yet secured''. Prod has been contested. Ben Ben (talk) 16:19, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belarus-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:06, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:06, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:06, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 27 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - Atleast for now. This story will probably be making headlines when he goes to trial. Or similar.. I say keep anyway.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:59, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * WP:CRYSTAL, we don't keep because we think there will be future notability. LibStar (talk) 08:02, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:21, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete for now. I would be OK with a redirect to 2011 Minsk Metro bombing, however, the information is so new and so sketchy that I think it is best to err on the side of WP:HARM. Location (talk) 22:44, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:PERP. also as per WP:BLP, we should not really be creating articles for people on trial for a serious crime until convicted. LibStar (talk) 08:03, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete: as per WP:PERP and WP:BLP. Jezhotwells (talk) 04:16, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.