Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E@I


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 04:26, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

E@I

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Notability. I'm just not finding secondary coverage of this. Nor anything primary that's really convincing me of its significance. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:53, 10 June 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:23, 17 June 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:20, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:53, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Nothing found for this educational conference, only things hitting on Euler's complex numbers. Sourcing used appears primary. Oaktree b (talk) 23:01, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language, Education, Technology, Internet,  and Slovakia.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  00:10, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. This organization is well known in Esperanto-speaking circles, and I would expect most sources to be in that language. This search found a number of articles in news org sources that discuss the organization: (takes a moment to load the results). I think they're enough to demonstrate notability. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 13:41, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 05:31, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Not finding significant coverage in reliable and independent sources. Tagged "This article relies excessively on references to primary sources" since March 2017. -- Otr500 (talk) 04:20, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
 * What about the numerous Esperanto-language sources from the search results I linked above? —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 14:08, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
 * It would be helpful if you could pull out a WP:THREE from those search results. -- asilvering (talk) 05:30, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: I couldn't find any major news articles or independent reviews about this. The information seems to come from the conference organizers themselves, and it's been flagged for a while for needing more reliable sources.  Waqar 💬 17:30, 3 July 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.