Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E³.series


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 01:45, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

E³.series

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Procedural AFD. Clearly promotional, reads like a press release, no evidence or statement of notability as a product, very skimpy referencing. Was ready to be deleted at PROD, but it had been PRODed and deleted in 2008. A later recreation was deleted as CSD G11. David Gerard (talk) 21:07, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:45, 22 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - Subject lacks notability and significant coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 02:31, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete probably not even worth a redirect or merge. Work instead might go into beefing up Zuken to be more than some bullet lists. W Nowicki (talk) 22:45, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * yeah, they look like the sort of thing you might want to look up, but sourcing ... - David Gerard (talk) 23:23, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as this borders on WP:SPAM as some sort of advertisement copy about E³.series Burroughs&#39;10 (talk) 19:46, 27 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.