Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E-Safety


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW. The Bushranger One ping only 08:00, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

E-Safety

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unreferenced original research. It's an essay, not an encyclopedic article. Zhaofeng Li &#91;talk &diams; contribs&#93; 08:38, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - Looks like you already CSD tagged the article. It's one or the other, you don't have to do both, just letting you know.  The StormCatcher   (talk)   (contribs)  08:40, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 * It was User:333-blue who CSD'd that. I was just about to remove this AfD. Zhaofeng Li &#91;talk &diams; contribs&#93; 08:42, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2015 December 19.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 08:49, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - It's here now, hopefully an admin will close it as a delete quickly, since the article creator continues to screw up the tags at the article's beginning. Clearly an example of WP:ISNOT.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:33, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - if this can't be speedied, then it's pure WP:OR, and fails WP:NOTHOWTO. Actually it's a how-to essay invented by the editor and traced to Twitter. Enough said. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:30, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Pure original research. Better suited to a personal website or blog than an encyclopedia (WP:ALTERNATIVE). clpo13(talk) 22:01, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 22:02, 19 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Snow delete Almost a G10. Lots of promotion, and nothing of any encyclopaedic value. Adam9007 (talk) 00:23, 20 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.