Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E-Twow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Consensus herein is for deletion. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 00:09, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

E-Twow

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability per WP:PRODUCT. Online coverage consists of listings on several online scooter dealers, can't find any product reviews or coverage in WP:Reliable sources. Dai Pritchard (talk) 15:12, 13 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom; the only sources are from the company's own site (not independent) and a seemingly self-written review (likewise). No indication of notability as defined by relevant policies. - Biruitorul Talk 22:17, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:58, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:58, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 09:52, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The E-Twow company is only a few years old, but it’s new unique e-scooter technologies are proving to be popular as they have released a few new models every year. Their design department has the skills and patentable ideas that have taken these e-scooter a few steps ahead of their competition.
 * As our world changes over to a more renewable and sustainable way of commuting, these well designed cutting edge e-scooters will play a big role in this transformation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cotemar (talk • contribs) 18:49, 20 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. WP:ADMASQ by, I'm guessing, company owner Robert Dasc. (The article was created by an SPA named Robert291.) Pax 21:39, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: Although this product has some coverage, none of them add to the product's notability per WP:PRODUCT:


 * – basically a press release website, companies can publish press releases through that site. Since this source is not independent of the subject, it does not add to the article's notability.
 * – forum post, fails WP:UGC.
 * – Another "press release distribution network", source is affiliated with the subject.
 * – Another press release.
 * The parent company does not have an article, so merging isn't an option. Esquivalience t 04:06, 21 March 2015 (UTC)


 * - An objective and independent product review by a reputable website in this niche — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.102.124.50 (talk) 14:44, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.