Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E-Zest Solutions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Grand master  ka  03:41, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

E-Zest Solutions
Non notable company with non noticeable products. There is no mention of the company in indian media. Ageo020 00:55, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep It appeared at this convention. The description at that site I just linked to seems to provide some sort of convincing level of notability. The article is indeed poorly written though. --  tariq abjotu  (joturner) 01:30, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete blatant advertisent for a marketably small un-notable company. WP:CORP Somerset219 03:17, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: It can't stay like this, and the article offers us no wedge with which to crack the subject open.  Investigation shows that the company is not particularly large.  The copy is not quite advertising as much as it looks like the replica of the company's website summary.  Geogre 04:01, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Looks like advertising. -- Jared Hunt July 29, 2006, 06:36 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. The user who created the page is called Ezest. I think that is enough to discard this article as blatant advertising. Black-Velvet  06:50, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as vanispamcruftisement for a non-notable company. Unfortunately, advertising isn't a speedy criterion. --Core des at talk. ^_^ 06:56, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete The copy is advertising, violating WP:SPAM. Wikipedia is not free ad space. --DarkAudit 17:43, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. &mdash; Khoikhoi 18:14, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom, nn company. rootology 18:51, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. Does not assert criteria based on WP:CORP. -- moe .RON   talk  00:42, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.