Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E-packaging


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles (talk) 01:10, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

E-packaging

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unreferenced and non-notable. neologism. Google suggests the term is used in various contexts, but none as defined in this article.

Possible coatrack for the company that coined the term.

Author contested PROD with the rationale "the proposal of deletion is not clear at all of me; eStoreMedia is running consumer research regarding eCommerce under the UE grant; all is published at Opisyproduktow.pl; hundreds stores participat" I42 (talk) 21:49, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment A couple of references have been added to the article. They are in Polish, though, and I cannot read them.--Hell on Wheels (talk) 22:25, 14 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment If someone needs to judge if the entry is "OK", I suggest using google translate to read the articles in Polish. --Bartezk —Preceding undated comment added 23:13, 14 July 2010 (UTC).


 * Delete - obvious promo spam. Stalwart111 (talk) 13:01, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - sales-oriented patent nonsense --- e-packaging stands for electronic packaging, i.e. product’s picture, text description and any other media that e-store uses to describe products for e-shoppers. e-packaging is essential for on-line retail in supporting marketing role of the real packaging --- and a non-notable neologism --- The term was introduced in 2009 by founders of Warsaw (Poland) based company eStoreMedia.com. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:28, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete — non-notable and spam. Visor (talk) 21:11, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as yummy spam. -- Nuujinn (talk) 21:09, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.