Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E-sharp minor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP. postdlf (talk) 20:59, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

E-sharp minor

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Redirect to F minor. Not notable - no works have used this key, no sources. Lanthanum-138 (talk) 06:25, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  —Lanthanum-138 (talk) 06:25, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Redirect per nom. E-sharp is equivalent to F. Eauhomme (talk) 20:21, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep It fulfils a useful function in the template:Circle of fifths. Redirecting it would require that the article on F minor has to incorporate the current text at E-sharp minor. The search provided above for books shows that the scale is mentioned in serious books. There are some compositions in this key. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 08:11, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep E sharp minor is not the same as F minor for various reasons, including that E sharp and F don't necessarily have the same pitch. A merged article would have what in appearance are two totally different concepts.  It is sufficient that e#minor appears on the Template:Circle of fifths.  Unscintillating (talk) 03:40, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. A quick skim of the scholar and book searches automatically linked in the nomination shows that this key has been used by Beethoven, Bach, Liszt, Chopin, Schoenberg, Vaughan Williams, Scriabin and I got fed up with adding to the list before I got anywhere near the end of the search links. The same searches also find many works on music theory that discuss this key. Phil Bridger (talk) 23:43, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep: The page seems to have function now. Seeking consensus to merge and redirect could be pursued without an AfD. -MrFizyx (talk) 20:28, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * How? Lanthanum-138 (talk) 07:23, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.