Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E.B. Hughes (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

E.B. Hughes
The result was   Delete as vanity spam per opinions below. Guy (Help!) 18:54, 21 July 2008 (UTC) AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Writer and film director of dubious notability. Excluding an IMDb profile and such, the only decent source I can find for this guy is an interview in relation to one of his films, and I'm not sure if this constitutes a sufficient claim of notability. In addition, the name of the author (User:Ebfilms) strongly suggests a serious WP:COI issue, and in fact the same user has created this article before, which was deleted here at AfD in November '06, and it's been prodded twice since then as well. If the outcome of this discussion is delete, can we please sprinkle it with some salt to prevent further recreation? PC78 (talk) 18:37, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   —PC78 (talk) 18:41, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: fails WP:BIO Toddst1 (talk) 18:41, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 *  Speedy delete per WP:SD; tagged accordingly. — Erik (talk • contrib) - 18:52, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Struck out "speedy" due to db-repost being declined; see Nancy's comment below. — Erik (talk • contrib) - 20:33, 20 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete - does not show any notability, fails WP:BIO. --triwbe (talk) 18:54, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:BIO. For the record I just declined the G4 speedy on this article as it as some significant additions compared to when it was last at AFD & so G4 does not apply (not that anyone could have known that without seeing the deleted revisions) - best now to let this current AFD run its course & then salt once it has finally been deleted. nancy  (talk) 19:20, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: Wholly unnotable. seicer  &#x007C;  talk  &#x007C;  contribs  17:58, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - body of work doesn't justify any indication of notability at this point, from what I can see. Tony Fox (arf!) 18:42, 21 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.