Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E. D. Marshall Jewelers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 05:08, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

E. D. Marshall Jewelers

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not significant or important for anything. Having been robbed happens to plenty of jewelery stores even if there was some local news coverage. Fails WP:ORG and WP:NOTNEWS. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:13, 1 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. There are millions of shops like that.  Yinta n  10:27, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. It might well be of some local interest, but nothing that's gone on there that is mentioned in the article or anywhere else seems to be all that notable.  FalconK (talk) 10:29, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:28, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:28, 1 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete by all means as PR and that alone, let's not kidding ourselves into thinking otherwise simply because a section about law troubles is listed, because the sources and information themselves still show this article only exists to state what the company is about and what the services are. The fact this article suggests it's part of a company PR campaign says alone, in that nothing else has happened aside from these sole contributions themselves. SwisterTwister   talk  18:54, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete concur with nom. No notability, one of millions of stores/shops in the world. MB 20:13, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:36, 1 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.