Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E/pop


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:31, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

E/pop
Blatant advertising. NN. -- worthawholebean talkcontribs 02:13, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 02:37, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as above Pintele Yid 02:59, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Arviragus 05:25, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I've read better written adcruft in my time... Segv11 (talk/contribs) 06:10, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete blatant advertisising. - Pureblade  | Θ 18:09, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. *\o/*Dustin McQuary *\o/* 19:19, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Not even useful as advertising. Crunch 23:58, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable software suite. &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-10 05:33Z 
 * Delete per nom. Werdna648T/C\@ 09:26, 10 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.