Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E21C


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 03:06, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

E21C

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article is about a spiritual centre which fails our notability guidelines as I cant find any significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources. The article currently doesn't evidence any notability, but I think the content is a little too substantive for an A7 speedy. It is also written with promotional language and does not discuss the subject from an encyclopedic standpoint.  Them From  Space  22:57, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can't find any reliable sources to prove this passes notability standards. Drmies (talk) 23:41, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I couldn't find any reliable sources mentioning E21C outside the publications mentioned in the article, and those are all self published.  Narthring (talk  • contribs) 04:32, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep: I found hundreds of sources. - Ret.Prof (talk) 11:56, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * There's a difference between Google hits and reliable sources. When I did a Google search and looked at many of the hits I wasn't able to find any verifiable third-party resources.  Narthring (talk  • contribs) 16:25, 2 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete This fails WP:N and the search results supplied above simply return basic cross-links (all with the same company-generated description), and not actual media coverage Transmissionelement (talk) 16:18, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.