Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E3 Style


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 01:53, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

E3 Style

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable small business; citations are to press releases Orange Mike   &#x007C;   Talk  02:54, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.


 * Delete. A product specialist, representing branded and OEM suppliers. Their product portfolio includes consumer electronics and convergence technology accessories.  If, after reading the lead paragraph, I haven't a bloody clue what they make or do, the article has problems that go beyond mere notability. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:09, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Press releases and obscure industry awards don't cut it. As Smerdis points out, it isn't really clear what this company makes.  Yo Gabba Gabba AV cables?  The Interior  (Talk) 15:28, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 20:18, 12 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete When I see adverting that unambiguous, even it it were on a subject that could possibly warrant inclusion (this dosen't), it makes me angry. Fails notability, fails neutrality.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  06:32, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.