Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E4B


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. This is a combination of a SNOW deletion and a speedy deletion, under speedy deletion criteria WP:CSD an WP:CSD: the discussion was clearly heading for deletion anyway, with nobody supporting keeping except for the creator of the article (using a sockpuppet); the article is blatant advertising; the article was created by a block-evading editor, and all significant contributions to it have come from that editor, shifting to another sockpuppet when the first one was blocked. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 22:48, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

E4B

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

All references are press releases. Apparently it's a business model proposed by a Chinese company named JUMORE (even though their website is jumoore.com with 2 o's) in 2016, and "JUMORE repeatedly proposed E4B model." Only claim to notability is "Some analysts believe that the E4B model is an innovative business model to open a new chapter in international cooperation in the America." Not seeing how this can ever be encyclopedic. Timmyshin (talk) 15:02, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:40, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:40, 21 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete' -- unambiguous promotion, with the model being "owned" by a non-notable company Jumore. I will request a speedy deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment -- article was created from a redirect by indef banned user, a confirmed sock. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:10, 22 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete - not just spam, but crazy spam. It's like the kid on Project Runway who thinks he invented the slit dress. Bearian (talk) 03:20, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - It has these,123 ,i don't think it breaking rules about WikipediaIamE4B (talk) 11:25, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - I hope you can justice with the articles ,The major portal Netease reports,huanqiureports,NetEasereports,ifengreports,CCTVreports,yahooreportsIamE4B (talk) 11:25, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * delete badly written, promotional, nothing worth salvaging.-- JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 06:50, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Uh,I don't think that is a reasonable reason about JohnBlackburne said,no one will walk in the birth,Everyone needs to learn,Is not it?-- IamE4B (talk) 15:03, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * SNOW Delete as the speedy was removed twice by the author while there was still advertising and what's currently here is still violating WP:NOT, which is enough alone. SwisterTwister   talk  07:22, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep What sentences do you mean?SwisterTwister IamE4B (talk) 15:40, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Now,It has changed IamE4B (talk) 16:09, 22 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.