Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EASEUS Data Recovery Wizard Professinal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was: Speedily deleted. Current version of the article Partition Table Doctor is a copyright violation from here and here; previous one was blatant spam. The other two articles are also speedily deleted as spam and/or copyright violation. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 10:04, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

EASEUS Data Recovery Wizard Professinal

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsourcedl, high WP:COI issues, other deletion methods are not possible. VivioFa teFan  (Talk, Sandbox) 06:18, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following articles for deletion for the same reason:


 * Delete Nothing shows up for the first article (Google search) that could be used to cite it aside from some reviews; the same goes for Partition Table doctor (Google'd). However, they seem to be slightly notable in tech circles; maybe I'm not looking in the right place. Master of Puppets   Call me MoP! ☺  06:42, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. KurtRaschke (talk) 06:45, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Spam - such a professinal product that they can't even spell. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 08:29, 16 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.