Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EAT! Vancouver


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus with no prejudice against speedy renomination. I highly suggest that User:The Interior find some sources verifying that this subject is notable. Keep in mind that blogs are very rarely reliable sources. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 21:56, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

EAT! Vancouver

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unreferenced. No evidence of any notability. Fails WP:CORP. Looks like WP:ARTSPAM.  Velella  Velella Talk 21:32, 15 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 21:46, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep After a quick search, there looks to be substantial local coverage: Georgia Straight. If it is indeed the "largest consumer food fair" in Canada, that's evidence of notability right there. (I know it's just Canada, but give us some credit, eh. ;) The Interior  (Talk) 22:42, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 23:47, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 23:47, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 23:34, 16 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Ri l ey    00:32, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Ri l ey    00:07, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Keep per Interior. - Ret.Prof (talk) 14:58, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 03:02, 5 January 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.