Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ECW Natural Born Killaz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 00:22, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

ECW Natural Born Killaz
A small ECW event that isn't a big part of it's history. This is just one of many ECW events that don't belong here. RobJ1981 18:36, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Not delete Either keep it and clean it up or merge it into something like an ECW pay-per-view page. The PPV meets WP:N, but lack informationis all. — The Future  20:02, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Stong Delete. This was NOT a ECW PPV, it was just a regular event. ECW gave most of their events unique names whether they were relevant or not. TJ Spyke 09:26, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete, Mainly because there is no consensus that non-PPV rasslin' events should be included without some special reason (and even individual PPVs that share the same monkier should usually be merged into something on the history of the event or whatnot).  young  american  (ahoy-hoy) 12:26, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I would like to add the following events if Rob doesn't mind, because they are the same as this(non-notable event that only has an article becuase of their unique names): ECW Born To Be Wired, ECW Double Tables, ECW Beer, Blood, Babes, and Barbed Wire, ECW When Worlds Collide, ECW The Night The Line Was Crossed, ECW Ultra Clash, ECW Enter The Sandman. TJ Spyke 20:08, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Why not merge all the articles into one, making it one article, instead of deleting the history? — The Future  02:15, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * None of these events were notable though, ECW just had a history of giving most of their shows unique names, just like we don't have pages for every single WWE tour(despite them all having unique names). TJ Spyke 03:48, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Thats still no reason why we can't have a list of the names somewhere. (Not the results though) Why don't you just list them under a new section on List of ECW pay-per-view events? Even though they aren't pay-per-views, there is a section for non-pay-per-view supercards on this article, so make a new section there maybe? — The Future  11:37, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm OK witht them being listed there, just not having their own pages. TJ Spyke 20:16, 2 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep the wrestling PPV events. --badlydrawnjeff talk 00:09, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * They are not PPV's. They were just regular events with unique names. TJ Spyke 02:43, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Some of them were, I deprodded the ones that were PPVs. Keep those. --badlydrawnjeff talk 02:47, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * None of the events listed in this AFD were PPV's. TJ Spyke 03:13, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * ECW When Worlds Collide wasn't? --badlydrawnjeff talk 03:15, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * You must be thinking of AAA: When Worlds Collide, AAA When Worlds Collide. TJ Spyke 03:34, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Edgecution 03:15, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete there is no reason for this crap to be on, it is not even a shade close to notable. Renosecond 05:18, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete Ultimately, it comes down to whether or not it's fancruft...which this is. Had this even been slightly notable I'd most likely change my vote to "delete" or "weak delete," but this show ultimately wasn't of much consequence (if any at all) in terms of major events in the promotion.  Deputy Marshall 06:21, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete The only ECW shows that are remotely notable are television programmes and pay-per-view events which these are not. --Oakster (Talk) 20:28, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- bullet proof  3:16 21:06, 3 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.