Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EComfort


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Deleted (G11) by . nac – Davey 2010 Talk 01:59, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

EComfort

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:GNG. References are either company web page, directory listings, or articles which mention subject in passing or not at all. Also, violates WP:COI. ubiquity (talk) 15:08, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Comment: An analysis of the eight citations reveals the following: There is no significant coverage from reliable sources here. ubiquity (talk) 15:09, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) not actually about subject (interview with CEO on home maintenance topics)
 * 2) subject's web page
 * 3) subject's web page
 * 4) not actually about subject (article about zero-logistics e-commerce)
 * 5) does not even mention subject
 * 6) directory listing
 * 7) does not even mention subject
 * 8) not actually about subject (contains quote from CEO)

Delete - I removed two of the most obvious irrelevant references. What's left does not provide enough coverage per WP:CORPDEPTH to satisfy WP:NCORP. It doesn't help that the article was authored by someone from the company itself, with an obvious conflict of interest. --Drm310 (talk) 15:33, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 19:45, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 19:45, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 19:45, 11 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Despite Drm310's heroic and Quixotic efforts, this is, as he notes, still spam. Pax 07:50, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.