Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EDIFECS


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 15:38, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

EDIFECS

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not really notable. references do not establish notability. Existing isn't enough to pass WP:CORP Dennis Brown (talk) 00:51, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Mild delete - gnews hits are about 90% press releases, and most of the rest are two-to-four sentence mentions like this, but mixed in there is this more in-depth piece. Still, the article in its current state could probably get speedied as WP:PROMO. --Nat Gertler (talk) 03:30, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:01, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:02, 12 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:B2B rationale. &mdash; Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 14:02, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Current text qualifies for speedy deletion as unambiguous advertising.  a Healthcare Information Management company specilaizing in providing software for improving Healthcare efficiency by providing transactional efficiency tools for Providers and Payer organizations - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 23:15, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.