Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EDWinXP (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:19, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

EDWinXP
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A7, G4 & G11 but since it's been here for years AfD seems more reasonable than CSD. Bazj (talk) 11:40, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:05, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:05, 6 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Was Spam in 2006, Is still spam in 2015, Personally I agree this is a clear A7 but I won't tag it seeing as it's been here for nearly 10 years. – Davey 2010 Talk 18:28, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - There are much worse articles but this one could also be better and my searches (News, Books, highbeam and thefreelibrary) found no good coverage aside from some News. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SwisterTwister (talk • contribs) 21:25, 6 June 2015‎


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.