Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EFOSMO


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:29, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

EFOSMO

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This article has many issues. If I understand correctly, EFOSMO is a proposed model that was presented in two academic papers that were published in several journals across the globe. Nothing further happened with the proposed model so I conclude that the subject does not meet WP:GNG and the article should be deleted. Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 16:28, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rusty4321  talk contribs 19:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 16:28, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Support deletion: The article has multiple issues, but chiefly does not seem notable. Constant314 (talk) 18:43, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete Cannot find any sources outside of the two papers that invent the term. I also note that the article was created by User:EFOSMO so was probably intended as promotion of the concept or term. Lamona (talk) 04:42, 15 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.