Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EForward


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus; 3:2 to keep. –  Sceptr e  ( Talk  ) 14:51, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

EForward
Non-notable?


 * No Delete: I'm listing this here to debate. I wrote the article, and feel it is notable.  It is about a speicalized protocol that isn't used much outside of one industry, but the protocol is a registered protocol and is used.  As the original author, I'd rather debate than remove the delete markers myself. -- DStaal 19:34, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - it seems like technical information not an ad. Maybe someone else convince me otherwise.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 01:40, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable, and the article provides neither any technical information itself (save for the IANA-registered port) nor links to such. If it had an RFC, that's one thing, but it doesn't. To mine eyes, it looks like an ad for the author's company, more or less. --moof 05:37, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - per above. Wickethewok 06:22, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - all it needs is more info, the concept itself seems worth writing about. Maury 12:28, 5 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.