Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EGM Green (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  23:41, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

EGM Green
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Third time's a charm, I hope. This company has somehow survived two AfDs despite failing the notability guidelines for companies. The available sources are thinly-veiled press releases, not providing genuinely independent coverage. – Teratix ₵ 13:06, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Games, Companies, Environment,  and New Jersey. – Teratix ₵ 13:06, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:24, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I agree with you that the sources are not very reliable and they (including the article itself) all seem like a big advetisement. Have you found any good sources anywhere that are reliable? Because I don't believe this exactly needs to be deleted, but it might be able to be improved. Coulomb1 (talk) 14:31, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I've had a thorough look in all the usual places you'd expect to find sources on this sort of company and found no decent sources. They're all either associated with the company or regurgitating its press releases. – Teratix ₵ 14:55, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I think a delete is a viable option. Everything about this corporation is a big ad. Coulomb1 (talk) 14:23, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. Press releases pop up about once every 5-6 years in the card gaming press. Not enough business traction for notability. MNewnham (talk)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.