Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EH9 6632


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:26, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

EH9 6632

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I can find no reliable evidence that this object even exists. There are a handful of social media entries and youTube videos, but that's about it. Even those could well be copied from list of largest cosmic structures which contains this object with no citation. Zero research published on such an object. I don't even know what the EH9 catalogue would be. Lithopsian (talk) 19:13, 22 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. There's absolutely no RS for this. --Hirsutism (talk) 19:57, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:58, 22 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete this has no mention on Google scholar, so it is very likely a hoax. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:43, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete can only find this in unreliable sources; probably a hoax. Loooke (talk) 17:40, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I cannot find a single reliable source that mentions EH9 6632; this page is very linkly a hoax so, It is probably Caelum Supercluster which is the largest known supercluster with 910 million light-years. Lithopsian is right and also I saw some videos that mentions EH9 6632.
 * Ex:Size comparison of everything alternative version, 행성크기 우주 Universe in Perspective Update 2010, Best size comparison universe 2016 Part.3 Lastpart and Best Ultimati Size comparison universe 2017 & Zoom Universe OUT
 * Maybe EH9 6632 exists and is outside of the Observable Universe (Diameter=93 billion ly) but it is part of the Entire Universe (Diameter=At least 552 billion ly? (13.799 ± 0.021 billion (age of the Universe) x 40 ly) (or maybe Infinite?)). Thank you — ~   Zaperator Ynoss Pro   44 71 ★     ✉  /  CONTRIBS  ~ 11:00, 24 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.