Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EJ DiMera and Nicole Walker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –MuZemike 00:54, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

EJ DiMera and Nicole Walker

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The entire article is a plot summary of events in the TV series by the couple. The only claim to notability is, The coupling has gained a strong following on many forums and message boards, across the internet with a reference to a fan site. WP:PLOT. Vanadus (talk | contribs) 05:00, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

I would have to disagree, yes the article is rough around the edges. However I do believe that once all of the right sources and refrences have been gathered it would the criteria for as an article. And I also believe that the claim for them as a couple or super can be made in the fact that the coupling does have a large fanbase of supporters. Know I now many couplings have fanbases but I do believe that theirs is notable especially considering that they have been togethered 3 times in the past three years. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sashak90 (talk • contribs) 06:26, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:02, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:02, 13 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - They don't seem to be a supercouple to me, the only reliable source I could find was on The Examiner which is inexplicably on the Spam Blacklist, and this article is mostly a plot summary which violates WP:PLOT. --Madison-chan (talk) 22:28, 14 November 2011 (UTC)Madison-chan


 * Delete as non-notable combination. Stuartyeates (talk) 05:50, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.