Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EJadSPM System, Complete Web Host Billing & Hosting Automation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete via WP:CSD. If anyone wants the content, just drop me a line on my talk. Kwsn  (Ni!)  16:25, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

EJadSPM System, Complete Web Host Billing & Hosting Automation
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Speedy tag removed on the grounds of similar articles existing. PROD would probably be contested. This article lacks reliable independent sources that would verify the notability of this product, and it is written in a tone which is promotional, not encyclopedic.

Also nominating:


 * Helm, Web Hosting Control Panel
 * cPanel
 * EJadSPM System, Web Host Billing & Hosting Automation Software

Delete all except cPanel, which was included for the sake of fairness.

Blanchardb 12:17, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete All unless notable third party references can be found and added to the pages. The pages of EjadSPM & Helm are all filled with Hogwash and no notable third party references. The cPanel page is lacking references all together, but a search on google shows wide spread use of this app. So Weak Delete for cPanel. Ghits for EjadSPM are few and none are ground breaking. GHits for helm are more, but since the article is written like an ad, i still vote delete on that one too. Andante1980 12:44, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete EJadSPM Software, EJadSPM Automation, and Helm, as all three appear to be unsourced and unsourceable. Notability issues exist as well, though - according to the article - the EJadSPM software was released in November of 2007, so maybe it'll be notable enough for an article in time. No objections to a (properly named!) future article on any of the three, provided that it is neutral and well-sourced. Keep cpanel, as it appears to be both sourceable and notable. ZZ Claims~ Evidence 14:57, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all. Each of these articles includes unencyclopedic puffery (From cPanel: designed to make administration of websites easy). Even if the subjects were noteworthy they would all have to be rewritten from scratch.  None of these packages are really consumer software, and there is no showing of notability for any of them in the articles as they now stand. - Smerdis of Tlön 15:07, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete All, Except cPanel. Puffery can be fixed. Non-notability can't except for the passage of time and external forces.  spryde |  talk  15:48, 12 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.