Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EKOSPOL


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete Salvio Let's talk about it! 22:20, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

EKOSPOL

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article was written originally as a heavily promotional piece by an editor who appears to have a close connection with the company. It has been somewhat scrubbed of the obviously promotional writing.

A review of the references (in Google Translate since they're all written in Czech) appears to show that they are all mostly published by the company (press releases and the such), affiliated with the company in some way (fifth reference especially), or trivial coverage (non-notable awards, sponsorship initiatives, and basic company information) as defined in WP:NCORP.

An online search did not turn up any clear, reliable secondary coverage. Therefore, my reasoning for deletion is twofold: the article's subject fails NCORP, and its publication was motivated by promotional soapboxing. EclipseDude (talk) 08:48, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:06, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:06, 20 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete the article is still promotional, so WP:NOTPROMO and WP:DEL14 applies, and there doesn't appear to be any indepth coverage for WP:CORPDEPTH, per nom Galobtter (pingó mió) 09:21, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete, the refs don't establish notability and the article sniffs nn. I haven't googled them as I don't speak the language. Szzuk (talk) 13:24, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:NCORP and violates WP:PROMO. Potentially WP:G11. Kirbanzo (talk) 17:31, 28 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.