Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EMJAE


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus. - Mailer Diablo 16:45, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

EMJAE
Non-notable DJ, prod removed by author Wildthing61476 14:17, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. No notability asserted and none found. Note to other vanity authors: phrases like "captured the attention of" and "found a home with" are always dead giveaways. Kafziel 14:27, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as no notability asserted. Molerat 14:31, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I would say the release list is an assertion of some notability at least. Wickethewok 14:38, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Are Lost Language and/or Release Records major indie labels? They just seem like minor indie labels to me. Molerat 14:47, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I suppose I would call Lost Language a "major indie" label. Its certainly "major".  Release Records might be, I dunno what the definition of a "major indie label" is exactly - Release has certainly featured records from popular artists if that means anything.  Also he apparently had releases on other labels including System Recordings and Dust Traxx Records.  Wickethewok 19:27, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep with cleanup per Wickethewok. Molerat 21:34, 3 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep - The article is badly written/formatted, but this artist has had several releases on notable labels such as Lost Language, Release Records, and a few others. The release list does appear to be accurate from my searching on Discogs and music review websites, though "Emjae" is often misspelled as "Emjay". Wickethewok 14:37, 3 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment I noticed this AfD was a week old, shouldn't it have been closed? Wildthing61476 15:14, 10 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete No reliable sources given, search turns up one gushy blog review, no non-trivial coverage, nothing on Amazon. ~ trialsanderrors 19:22, 10 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.