Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ENDWORLD


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete under A7 by User:StephenBuxton. (NAC) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 16:48, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

ENDWORLD

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No reliable references. sillybillypiggy 12:50, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:28, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:28, 19 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:BAND - non-notable label, no significant media coverage. Colon el Tom 13:35, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - no real claim of notability. --Nat Gertler (talk) 15:22, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - textbook example of a nn group that fails WP:BAND. MikeWazowski (talk) 15:27, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - no need for discussion, the content is poor and unsourced, and when they indeed publish an album (covered by media) it will not be a problem to restore. Pundit | utter  16:07, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.