Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EOS International


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Joyous! | Talk 01:48, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

EOS International

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:ORG. Could not find significant coverage, also searched by long name. 8 of the provided sources are its own website. LibStar (talk) 00:04, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Minnesota. Shellwood (talk) 00:09, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nicaragua-related deletion discussions. LibStar (talk) 05:45, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. LibStar (talk) 05:46, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Likely a wonderful organization, but no one outside the organization has spilled sufficient ink since 2011 to meet WP:SIRS. Rhadow (talk) 18:53, 16 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.