Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EPIK


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as nothing else has been suggested otherwise (NAC). SwisterTwister  talk  05:31, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

EPIK

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems spammy: a company/government program that exists, but has next to no coverage about itself (the usual few mentions in passing can be found in the Google, of course). Seems to fail WP:NCOMPANY. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:32, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:57, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:57, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nordic   Nightfury  08:14, 6 September 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep: A Google Books search uncovers plenty of independent, reliable sources on this. The article itself is unfortunately poorly written and incorporates only sources that are not independent. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 15:19, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Could you cite some of those sources? Please keep in mind that mentions in passing do not suffice. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:35, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:02, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep -- sourcing seems sufficient; pls see, for example, a chapter from Globalization of Language and Culture in Asia: link. Here's substantial mention in Secondary School English Education in Asia: link. I believe this should be enough to sustain an article. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:45, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Withdrawing nomination. User:K.e.coffman located and linked sources which are sufficient to address my concerns. Thank you, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 05:14, 19 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.