Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EPartner Consulting Ltd


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:22, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

EPartner Consulting Ltd

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I uncover no sources to support inclusion under WP:GNG or WP:CORP. Largoplazo (talk) 18:10, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:54, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:54, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 20:25, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Comment I would also note that there is an inconsistency between the article's name (which uses a capital "E", for "EPartner Consulting Ltd") and the text, which uses a small "e" for "ePartner Consulting Ltd". But I don't think that effected my searches. 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 20:39, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unless they come up with sources.  I've looked per WP:Before and this seems thin to me.  7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 20:18, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I would also note that this was a new editor that drafted the article, and that the approval of its move to main space was by someone (User: AlanIngram) who actually has very limited experience, and whose main editing concerned TeleForm. These histories are rife with WP:COI, but I only have circumstantial proof.  The sourcing and article formats come from the same cookie cutter. <b style="color:#060">7&amp;6=thirteen</b> (<b style="color:#000">☎</b>) 21:01, 25 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete: An article on a firm which provides resale and consultancy on niche products. Notability is not inherited from the commercial history of the firms which have offered these products and I am not seeing evidence to demonstrate that this firm is notable. AllyD (talk) 07:45, 26 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.