Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EQATEC Profiler


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.--Bigtimepeace | talk |  contribs 05:45, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

EQATEC Profiler

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable software, just released. Weregerbil (talk) 16:56, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment&mdash;(I'm the author) Agree to lack of software's notability. The issue of .NET CF code-profiling has, however, much merit as the lack of any available code-profiler has been eagerly discussed at least since 2003. This article describes the current state of affairs, but I agree that a more suitable article topic would have been e.g. "Performance analysis tools for .NET CF". That topic may not warrant an entire article, though, as there are unfortunately very few such tools available for those brave souls doing embedded programming on .NET Compact Framework. Ricflams (talk) 19:10, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 00:21, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. No support of independent reliable sources to establish notability of new software package. B.Wind (talk) 05:08, 8 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.