Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ERA Othello Realty


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus, just make redirect. - Mailer Diablo 04:47, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

ERA Othello Realty
Speedy Delete: Clearly an advertisement for a simple franchise owner.Steroid Expert 08:48, 31 July 2006 (UTC) Added title. Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 09:51, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Definitely not a candidate for speedy deletion (this is not the appropriate place to propose speedies, anyway). It doesn't read like an advertisement, either.  Please assume good faith.  Although I agree that the business does not seem notable enough for an article of its own, I don't see why this can't simply be redirected to ERA Real Estate, and have taken the liberty of doing just that.  fuddlemark (befuddle me!) 10:19, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep the redirect but should the target be on AfD also?  I don't know what to make of "ERA Real Estate became an indepndent subsidiary of the Realogy Corporation on August 1, 2006" - we're on different worldlines here!    Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  16:27, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, now that it is redirect. I am giving the target article the benefit of the doubt. Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 16:34, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete anyway, even though now changed to a redirect. (As an aside, real estate agencies and agents have a special set of rules to remove multiple incarnations in the Open Directory Project.  Only travel agents have a similar restriction.) I realize it doesn't meet the requirements for WP:RfD, but I wouldn't be surprised if it changes back to Vanispamcruftisement after this XfD completes.  &mdash; Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 22:55, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, even though it's a redirect to the WP:CORP-meeting parent company. Redirects are cheap as free, but this one doesn't seem particularly useful, and nothing has been merged. -- Kinu t /c  15:09, 1 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.