Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ERONET


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. J04n(talk page) 18:54, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

ERONET

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company. No reliable sources I could find to improve this article or establish notability. Xaxing (talk) 17:09, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as searches only found a few links, nothing convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  23:38, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * What searches "only found a few links" and "nothing convincing"? Certainly not the news and books searches spoon-fed above. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 19:02, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  23:41, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  23:41, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bosnia and Herzegovina-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  23:41, 1 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Inadequate sources, wrong language. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:45, 2 May 2016 (UTC).
 * When you wrote that there were several sentences in the article in the right language. The fact that there were some more sentences in the wrong language doesn't create any sort of anti-notability. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 19:02, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Strong keep. FFS, it's a major mobile provider in a European country. It originated as a subsidiary of Hrvatski Telekom, and since 2009 it's listed on Sarajevo Stock Exchange and owned 51% by the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina . It's main sponsor of the Sarajevo Film Festival, it got involved in a financial controversy in 2014 . It has 679 hits on Google News , which should have been the first point of reference for the nominator or any of the commenters above. I'm disappointed by the level of ignorance on display here: if you don't know the language and don't know how to search, how about not commenting on an AfD? No such user (talk) 10:05, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - sources in English are lacking, although some exist. However, sources don't have to be in English and there are plenty of foreign-language sources. Just based on machine translations the sources from Google News seem to satisfy notability requirements. No longer a penguin (talk) 13:32, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  23:02, 2 May 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep as the google news search confirms notability. It meets WP:GNG, has some sources, but the google news search clinches it for me, it's notable. ThePlatypusofDoom  (Talk) 23:52, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per the consensus among commenters making valid arguments that existed before this was relisted. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 21:04, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:21, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article needs serious work but this is a notable company with plenty reliable sources. DeVerm (talk) 02:14, 10 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.