Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ERPLAB


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:35, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

ERPLAB

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not have significant coverage in independent secondary sources. Google Scholar locates a number of references to this software, but they appear to be all brief mentions of its use in other projects, rather than significant discussion of the product itself. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 00:04, 11 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Neutral I know this software from my own work and I can attest anecdotally that people in the field are familiar with it. But I can't dig up any coverage in independent sources of the kind Wikipedia generally requires for demonstration of notability. r ʨ anaɢ (talk) 01:28, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:04, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Reaper Eternal (talk) 00:12, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete, reluctantly - The noteworthiness of this topic may be difficult to judge for the general reader, but the bottom line is that without significant secondary source material there is neither evidence of notability nor any raw material to construct an article out of. The present version of the article, written by editors with close connections to the subject, is a mix of OR and primary source material. In short, if it's not been written about in reliable sources, there shouldn't be a Wikipedia article about it. -- Rrburke (talk) 17:33, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong delete nothing in gnews. LibStar (talk) 08:27, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.