Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ERPNext


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 07:47, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

ERPNext

 * – ( View AfD View log )

no indication of WP:Notability. References given are small mentions and not significant coverage. Google does not provide anything better. Created by editor with acknowledged WP:COI. noq (talk) 14:43, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:37, 4 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Advertising: ...designed to be easy to use and ideal for small businesses.  It has a core innovation.  More back office software advertising on Wikipedia. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:37, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. Please see all lists at List of ERP software packages. I want wikipedia to be sane but also fair. If this is advertising then all others are. I recommend restructuring the List of ERP software packages pages so that not all are forced to make pages. List should be allowed.Rushabhmehta1 (talk) 16:49, 4 October 2011 (UTC) — Rushabhmehta1 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment. I have no doubt you're right about that. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 17:02, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. Please mark all of these for deletion. Guess I will restructure the page list page too. BlueErp, Adaxa Suite, Fedena, FrontAccounting, GNU Enterprise, HeliumV, LedgerSMB, OpenPro, SQL-Ledger, Tryton, WebERP — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rushabhmehta1 (talk • contribs) 17:09, 4 October 2011 (UTC)   — Rushabhmehta1 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * KEEP. Deleting this article will not only be unfair but will deny a whole lot of people from discovering another reliable, flexible and effective way of being on top of their business operations. Wikipedia is known for access to information, allowing people to acquire or share knowledge and deleting the ERPNext article would go against this. Please keep the article; people need to be aware of this toolBukidalley (talk) 10:43, 5 October 2011 (UTC) — Bukidalley (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment How does it meet the WP:notability guidelines? WP:ILIKEIT is not a reason to keep the article. Wikipedia is not for promoting products such as this. noq (talk) 11:13, 5 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as SPAM. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:57, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep This doesnt come under Advertising.This is an opensource software. In that case you'l have to go and delete all pages from brands like cococ cola and pepsi and adidas and the likes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.119.238.77 (talk) 12:42, 11 October 2011 (UTC)   — 111.119.238.77 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment Coca Cola easily passes the WP:notability tests as it has been written about extensively for many years. As I have asked before, how does this particular opensource project meet the notability guidelines. Unless that can be shown then the article should be deleted. noq (talk) 18:11, 11 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment: With ref to WP:notability It says if there is a verifiable third party coverage on the topic it can be retained, please go through these links 1:http://www.pluggd.in/open-source-erp-software-erpnext-297/ 2: http://radar.oreilly.com/2011/09/four-short-links-21-september-2.html .Pluggd.in has around 5 million page views per month acc to wiki. The second link is from Oreilly radar which has mentioned erpnext as a good open-source choice for an erp. I hope that is sufficent enough to satisfy the criteria.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.63.18.92 (talk) 05:03, 12 October 2011 (UTC)   — 120.63.18.92 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete: Fails the GNG, fails WP:WEB, lack of reliable independent sources and admitted COI issues. Given that the only Keep proponents are SPAs who've proffered no arguments beyond WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and WP:ITSUSEFUL, why is this still an open AfD?  Ravenswing  11:44, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.