Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ER cast and characters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was withdrawn by the nominator. Non-admin closure. --Elkman (Elkspeak) 18:18, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

ER cast and characters
Nomination withdrawn by user who nominated. Page redirected.


 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Orphaned article whose content is already available in other articles. See ER (TV Series) and List of supporting characters in ER. These two articles cover all the information available in this orphaned article.  J o s h  22:08, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to ER (TV Series), seems to be most logical choice. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 22:16, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Not sure a redirect is needed since this isn't exactly a common phrase or single word, but that is a minor point and I wouldn't argue against it.  Pharmboy 01:44, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Close and Boldly Redirect. This sort of thing never needs to be dealt with at AfD. If you ever find an orphan article which is redundant with another which has fuller information, you can just redirect it there. You don't need to worry whether the redirect is really useful because redirects are cheap. That's always a better course than bringing the matter to AfD because AfD requires the time and concentration of a number of wikipedians, whereas the bold solution can be done, by any user (admin or not), in seconds. AndyJones 12:53, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Apologies for wasting AfD time. I've redirected and cancelled this AfD.  J o s h  14:08, 1 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Nothing to apologise for. Keep up the good work. AndyJones 16:06, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.