Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ERepublik


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep (Non-Admin Closure). Fun Pika  00:18, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

ERepublik

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable webgame. Only a single reliable source. Delete per WP:WEB and WP:CORP as they requitre multiple sources. Peephole (talk) 20:57, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 22:23, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Público.es is a print magazine, and TechCrunch has come up in a recent AfD. There's a Eurogamer article, an in-depth review at WorldsInMotion (Gamasutra), and news items at guardian.co.uk, InsideMacGames, SiliconRepublic and IGN. Overall you'e picked a bad set of games to prod. SharkD (talk) 04:52, 31 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep Covered well enough in sources. Captain   panda  03:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep Uses sources well and well-written for a neutral perspective. Deserves an article. Ryan-McCulloch (talk) 17:54, 3 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.