Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ERichards Consulting


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:38, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

ERichards Consulting

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable, unreferenced, company. Fails WP:CORP. Stedrick (talk) 17:49, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:21, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:21, 5 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Lacks sources, none to be found on Google, fails to state a reason this company even might be notable. Completely fails WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH.  Msnicki (talk) 19:26, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. : WP:NOTDIR - the only link is to  the firm's website. Wikipedia is not  a Yellow Pages. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:16, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as per nom and Kudpung. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 15:37, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.